likened deaths at the hands of police to choking at golf?

Trump made the remarks in an August 31, 2020 Fox News interview:

The police are under siege because of things – they can do 10,000 great acts, which is what they do, and one bad apple, or a choker – you know a choker, they choke, shooting the guy in the back many times. Couldn’t you have done something different? Couldn’t you have wrestled him? In the meantime, he might’ve been going for a weapon. And there’s a whole big thing there. But they choke. Just like in a golf tournament, they miss a three-foot putt.

The interview came after months of protests and riots after George Floyd was killed by police on video. Trump had threatened the use of “vicious dogs” and “ominous weapons,” and warned that “when the looting starts, the shooting starts.”

USA Today – Trump tells Ingraham some officers ‘choke’ during shootings, saying ‘They miss a 3-foot putt’
The Hill – Trump compares police who use force to golfers who ‘choke’
Business Insider – Trump denies fringe theory that a series of ‘mini-strokes’ prompted his unannounced trip to Walter Reed hospital last November
Forbes – Trump Denies ‘Series Of Mini-Strokes’ Prompted Surprise Walter Reed Visit

had peaceful protestors evicted from Lafayette Park with teargas for a photo op?

On June 1, 2020, amid national protests and riots following George Floyd’s death at the hands of police, Trump gave a speech wherein he threatened to unilaterally deploy the military to quell unrest.

First, we are ending the riots and lawlessness that has spread throughout our country. We will end it now. Today, I have strongly recommended to every governor to deploy the National Guard in sufficient numbers that we dominate the streets. Mayors and governors must establish an overwhelming law enforcement presence until the violence has been quelled.

 

If a city or a state refuses to take the actions that are necessary to defend the life and property of their residents, then I will deploy the United States military and quickly solve the problem for them.

After the speech at the White House, Trump headed to St. John’s Church for a photo op. Lafayette Square, which sits between the White House and the Church, was filled with people protesting the death of George Floyd. The park is famed for being a place to voice grievances, seeing hundreds of protests annually.

Map of the White House, Lafayette Square, and St. John’s. Google Earth

Attorney General William Barr gave the order for US Park Police, the federal organization responsible for overseeing and securing the park, to clear the area so Trump could proceed to St. John’s. Without warning, the federal officers equipped in riot gear deployed tear gas and rubber bullets on the crowd.

An Australian news crew on the scene filmed the moment the police began to advance. The cameraman was briefly attacked by one of the officers.

The administration originally claimed that no tear gas had been used, despite CS canisters being found at the scene. A spokesman for the US Park Service later said “It was a mistake on our part for using ‘tear gas’ [in our statement].”

Once Trump reached St. John’s, he posed with a Bible in front of the church briefly before leaving. When asked if it was his Bible, Trump simply responded, “it’s a Bible.”

Patrick Semansky / AP Photo

The pastor of St. John’s said he wasn’t made aware of the photo op. Mariann Budde, the Episcopal Bishop of Washington, DC noted that no one was “given even a courtesy call, that they would be clearing with tear gas so they could use one of our churches as a prop.”

Budde commented further on Twitter:

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff also issued an apology for his presence:

I should not have been there. My presence in that moment and in that environment created a perception of the military involved in domestic politics.

Several other military leaders, including former Secretary of Defense James Mattis, criticized Trump’s handling of protests both at Lafeyette Square and around the nation.

AP News – Tear gas, threats for protesters before Trump visits church
NPR – Peaceful Protesters Tear-Gassed To Clear Way For Trump Church Photo-Op

The Hill – US Park Police say it was a mistake to say no tear gas was used in Lafayette Square
USA Today – Donald Trump’s Bible or George Floyd’s? That’s the choice facing America’s Christians.
White House Historical Association – President’s Park: A History of Protest at the White House

Axios – St. John’s clergy: Trump used church as prop, Bible as symbol of division
The New York Times – Milley Apologizes for Role in Trump Photo Op: ‘I Should Not Have Been There’
Task & Purpose – Here are all the current and former military leaders blasting Trump’s response to nationwide protests
Wikipedia – Donald Trump photo op at St. John’s Church

threatened protesters with “vicious dogs” and “ominous weapons”?

In a string of tweets amid protests at the White House against George Floyd’s death at the hands of police, Trump threatened the use of “the most vicious dogs, and most ominous weapons.”

Two days prior, Trump also said of protests that “when the looting starts, the shooting starts.” His handling of protests were denounced by former Secretary of Defense James Mattis.

The New York Times – Trump Threatens White House Protesters With ‘Vicious Dogs’ and ‘Ominous Weapons’

was denounced by his former Secretary of Defense for making “a mockery of our Constitution”?

In June 2020, former Secretary of Defense James Mattis wrote an op-ed titled “In Union there is Strength” in which he attacked Trump’s handling of ongoing protests in the wake of George Floyd’s death at the hands of police.

Mattis specifically referenced Trump and what he considered to be a failure of leadership:

Don­ald Trump is the first pres­i­dent in my life­time who does not try to unite the Amer­i­can peo­ple — does not even pre­tend to try. In­stead, he tries to di­vide us. We are wit­ness­ing the con­se­quences of three years of this de­lib­er­ate ef­fort. We are wit­ness­ing the con­se­quences of three years with­out ma­ture lead­er­ship. We can unite with­out him, draw­ing on the strengths in­her­ent in our civil so­ci­ety. …We must re­ject and hold ac­count­able those in of­fice who would make a mock­ery of our Con­sti­tu­tion. At the same time, we must re­mem­ber Lin­coln’s “bet­ter an­gels,” and lis­ten to them, as we work to unite.

Mattis also commented on Trump’s handling of ongoing protests in the wake of George Floyd’s death at the hands of police:

At home, we should use our military only when requested to do so, on very rare occasions, by state governors. Militarizing our response, as we witnessed in Washington, D.C., sets up a conflict—a false conflict—between the military and civilian society.

Trump responded via tweet, calling Mattis “the world’s most overrated general.”

Mattis, a retired four-star Marine Corps general, resigned as SecDef in 2018 in protest to Trump’s Syrian policy and withdrawal of US troops from the area.

The Atlantic – James Mattis Denounces President Trump, Describes Him as a Threat to the Constitution
The New York Times – Mattis Accuses Trump of Dividing the Nation in a Time of Crisis

said of protests, “when the looting starts, the shooting starts”?

Amid mass protests the wake of George Floyd’s death at the hands of police, Trump threatened to deploy the the military to combat “thugs” and remarked, “when the looting starts, the shooting starts.”

The tweet was flagged by Twitter as violating its rules about glorifying violence.

Additionally, the phrase was coined by a notoriously racist Miami police chief in 1967, who also told the press “we don’t mind being accused of police brutality.” Trump’s handling of protests were denounced by former Secretary of Defense James Mattis.

CBS News – “When the looting starts, the shooting starts”: Trump tweet flagged by Twitter for “glorifying violence”
Business Insider – Trump claims his ‘when the looting starts, the shooting starts’ remarks weren’t a call to violence but instead a ‘fact’
Wikipedia – When the looting starts, the shooting starts

claimed that a 75-year-old protester injured by police was an Antifa provocateur?

On June 5th, a protester was filmed approaching police amid Buffalo protests in the wake of George Floyd’s death. The man, 75-year-old Martin Gugino, was pushed by an officer, and tumbled backwards onto the floor, heading his head with enough force to leave blood.

A Buffalo Police Department statement immediately released afterward appeared to claim that the man, who was the only known injury, had tripped and fallen:

A 5th person was arrested during a skirmish with other protestors and also charged with disorderly conduct. During that skirmish involving protestors, one person was injured when he tripped & fell.

The two officers involved were subsequently suspended, pending an internal investigation.

The following week, Trump took to Twitter to suggest that the protester, still hospitalized and recovering from his injuries, was an Antifa crisis actor, and that the entire thing “could be a set up.”

The New York Times – Trump Falsely Targets Buffalo Protester, 75, as ‘Antifa Provocateur’
Politico – Trump’s conspiracy theory on 75-year-old protester draws sharp backlash
NBC News – President Donald Trump tweets ‘antifa’ conspiracy theory that originated on anonymous blog
The Hill – Police officers in Buffalo suspended after shoving 75-year-old protester to the ground

said he’d like to punch a protester in the face?

In February 2016 during a Las Vegas rally, Trump mocked protesters as they were ejected, and boasted of how he would like to “punch them in the face” while reminiscing of past times when they would’ve had to be “carried out in a stretcher.”

I love the old days, you know. You what I hate, there’s a guy, totally disruptive, throwing punches, we’re not allowed to punch back anymore. I love the old days. You know what they used to do in the old days for guys like that in a place like this? They’d be carried out in a stretcher, folks. That’s true.

You know I love our police, I really respect our police, and they’re not getting enough, they’re not, but,  honestly, I hate to see that. Here’s a a guy throwing punches nasty as hell, screaming at everything else when and we’re talking, and he’s walking out and we’re not allowed, you know, the guards are very gentle with him. Like big high-fives, smiling, laughing.

Like to punch him in the face, I’ll tell ya.

Though Trump claimed multiple times that the protester in question was throwing punches of his own, there is no evidence to support it. A security officer present, who asked to remain anonymous, told Politico that Trump “was just over-exaggerating.”

That same month, Trump promised to pay the legal fees for anyone who would “knock the crap out of” protesters, which he later reneged on when a supporter assaulted a protester.

Politico – Trump on protester: ‘I’d like to punch him in the face’
The New York Times – Donald Trump on Protester: ‘I’d Like to Punch Him in the Face’
The Washington Post – Donald Trump on a protester: ‘I’d like to punch him in the face’

reminisced of when “there used to be consequences” for protesting?

As peaceful protesters were removed from a rally in St. Louis, Missouri, candidate Trump complained about how they were being peacefully ejected, lamenting how there used to be consequences for protest.

Part of the problem and part of the reason it takes so long [to kick them out] is nobody wants to hurt each other anymore. There used to be consequences. There are none anymore.

 

These people are so bad for our country. You have no idea folks, you have no idea.

The month prior, Trump promised to pay the legal fees for anyone who would “knock the crap out of” protesters, which he later reneged on when a supporter assaulted a protester.

Politico – Trump: ‘There used to be consequences’ for protesting

promised to pay legal fees for those that would “knock the crap out of” protesters?

In 2016, candidate Trump promised to pay the legal fees for anyone who would “knock the crap” out of protesters throwing tomatoes. When one of his supporters assaulted a peaceful protester, Trump backtracked, claiming he never made the promise.

If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of them, would you? Seriously. Okay, just knock the hell – I promise you, I will pay for the legal fees, I promise. I promise.

A week prior at an Iowa rally, a protester had thrown a tomato at Trump, which missed:

Soon after Trump promised to pay legal fees, John McGraw, 78, struck nonviolent protester Rakeem Jones at a North Carolina rally.

Rakeem Jones and John McGraw. Photos by Liz Condo for The Washington Post

Immediately after, an Inside Edition reporter asked McGraw about the act. He replied,

You bet I liked it. Knocking the hell out of that big mouth. We don’t know who he is, but we know he;s not acting like an American….yes we deserved it. The next time we see him, we might have to kill him. We don’t know who he is. He might be with a terrorist organization.

McGraw was charged with assault and battery, and called for Trump to own up to his word and pay his legal fees. Trump first said he “instructed my people to look into” the matter during an appearance on Meet the Press, but then later that same week on Good Morning America said,

Somebody asked me the question. And I hadn’t even seen it. So I never said I was going to pay for fees…I don’t condone violence at all. I looked and I watched and I’m going to make a decision, but I certainly don’t condone violence.

9 months after the incident, McGraw pleaded no content in court to assault and disorderly conduct charges. He was sentenced to a suspended 30-day jail sentence and a year on unsupervised probation.

McGraw shook hands with Jones in court, offering an apology which Jones accepted with an embrace.

The Washington Post – Trump: ‘Knock the crap’ out of tomato throwers
Los Angeles Times – Trump’s endorsement of violence reaches new level: He may pay legal fees for assault suspect
Time – Trump May Pay Legal Fees of Man Who Sucker-Punched Protester
Insider Edition – Trump Supporter Who Punched Protester: ‘Next Time, We Might Have To Kill Him’
The Washington Post – Trump rally protester and the supporter who punched him reconcile
Fox News – Donald Trump: ‘Never said’ I would pay supporters’ legal fees
Business Insider – Donald Trump walks back suggestion of paying legal fees for man accused of punching protester

said of NFL players kneeling in protest, “get that son of a bitch off the field”?

At an Alabama rally on September 23, 2017, Trump explained how he wanted to see NFL players fired for protesting the US flag and national anthem.

Wouldn’t you love to see one of these NFL owners, when someone disrespects our flag to say, ‘get that son of a bitch off the field right now. Out. He’s fired. He’s fired!

Trump’s remarks came after dozens of players across the regular and preseasons took a knee during the national anthem. They had joined Colin Kaepernick in protest the season prior, who was not on an NFL roster at the time of Trump’s remarks.

Kaepernick explained that the reason for his protest was because he was “not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color.” He was advised to take a knee by NFL player and former US Army Green Beret Nate Boyer, who considered it a form of protest most respectful to other service members.

AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez, File
AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez

Trump praised a later NFL ban on kneeling players, suggesting such protests were un-American:

You have to stand proudly for the national anthem or you shouldn’t be playing, you shouldn’t be there, maybe you shouldn’t be in the country.

NBC Sports -Trump to anthem protesters: ‘Get that son of a b—- off the field’
NFL.com – Colin Kaepernick explains why he sat during national anthem
NPR – The Veteran And NFL Player Who Advised Kaepernick To Take A Knee
BBC News – Trump: NFL kneelers ‘maybe shouldn’t be in country’

More assuredly to come soon

Error: Please refresh