said he didn’t need preparation or notes for a summit with Kim Jong-Un?

Trump explained that he didn’t need to prepare much for an upcoming summit with North Korea in Singapore, a first between the two nations. Instead, he explained that it was all about “attitude.”

He also said that he didn’t need notes from the meeting, due to having “one of the great memories of all time,” a claim Trump has repeated elsewhere.

After the meeting, Trump declared he would end “provocative” joint defense exercises in South Korea.

Boomberg – Trump Says He Doesn’t Need to ‘Prepare Very Much’ for Kim Summit
Politico – Trump says Kim meeting will be about ‘attitude,’ not prep work

ABC News – Trump says he doesn’t need to ‘prepare very much’ for North Korea summit, ‘it’s about attitude’
The Hill – Trump on lack of notes from Kim meeting: ‘I have one of the great memories of all time’

said that his tweets are sufficient notice to Congress for military strikes?

After a senior Iranian official was killed by drone strike, Congressional members balked at how the White House had failed to brief them on the attack. Trump said via tweet that no notice is required (in direct contradiction with the 1973 War Powers Act), but that his Twitter posts would serve as notice to Congress.

He has similarly failed to brief Congress for strikes, including when he told Russia and Turkey of an impending attack on an ISIS leader before anyone in Congress.

Business Insider – Trump claims his ‘Media Posts’ on Twitter now count as official notification to Congress about any plans to attack Iran
Stars and Stripes – Trump claims his tweets are sufficient notice to Congress that US might strike Iran

said that he would impose torture techniques “a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding?”

During a Republican primary debate, Trump said,

In the Middle East we have people chopping the heads off Christians, We have people chopping the heads off many other people. We have things that we have never seen before as a group, we have never seen before…

I would bring back waterboarding. And I would bring back a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding.

In another instance, Trump said that the US should “take out” the families of terrorists.

The Hill – Trump calls for ‘hell of a lot worse than waterboarding’
Chicago Tribune – GOP debate: Trump calls for a lot worse than waterboarding against terrorists
The Wall Street Journal – Trump Reaffirms Support for ‘Worse Than Waterboarding’

said he would “take out” the families of terrorists?

During a Fox News interview, Trump said that the problem with the US’ handling of the war against ISIS was that “we’re fighting a very politically correct war,” and so “the other thing is with the terrorists, you have to take out their families.”

Any intentional killing of civilian non-combatants is a war crime, though Trump previously asserted that the military wouldn’t refuse any orders from him.

Trump has also said he would reimpose torture techniques, threatened to target enemy cultural sites, and pardoned US soldiers convicted of war crimes.

Time – Donald Trump Says He’d ‘Take Out’ Terrorists’ Families
The Hill – Trump on terrorists: You have to take out their families
Politifact – Geneva Conventions bar Donald Trump’s idea of killing terrorists’ families, as Rand Paul says

threatened to bomb Iranian cultural sites?

Amid escalating tensions between the United States and Iran following the drone strike of a senior official, Trump threatened to destroy a variety of targets including “some at a very high level & important to Iran & Iranian culture.” The deliberate destruction of cultural sites constitutes a war crime. The Pentagon immediately contradicted Trump by ruling out any such targets.

The threat is in line with similar rhetoric that Trump has employed before, such as the need to target the families of terrorists or reinstate torture techniques.

BBC News – Trump says US ready to strike 52 Iranian sites if Tehran attacks
The New York Times – Pentagon Rules Out Striking Iranian Cultural Sites, Contradicting Trump

ordered a drone strike on a senior Iranian official?

On January 3, 2020 Qassem Soleimani, leader of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force and a senior political figure in the Iranian government, was killed by a drone strike, along with several others in his motorcade. The Quds Force was designated a state sponsor of terrorism in 2007, as it supported militant proxy groups like Hezbollah. Iran claimed that Soleimani was in Iraq at time to meet with officials to deescalating regional tensions. However, officials believed that he was working to target US military forces in the region to instigate reprisals and galvanize public support for the government, which had been facing domestic protests.

Trump received criticism of the unilateral action for escalating tensions by assassinating a political figure. While Israel and Saudi Arabia were briefed ahead of the move, and Trump reportedly made mention to patrons at his Florida resort Mar-a-Lago, no briefing was given to Congress. He had similarly briefed Russia on another airstrike before Congress. Instead, he asserted that his tweets constitute official notice. Tensions were further inflamed by his threat to target and destroy Iranian cultural sites, a war-crime, and a claim which the Pentagon ruled out.

While the White House had originally claimed that Soleimani posed an imminent threat, requiring the strike, little information was offered to Congress or the American people. His intelligence briefing was derided even by Republicans. Instead, Trump cited his “horrible past” as sufficient cause.

Though Trump withdrew the United States from the Iran nuclear deal and instituted sanctions, Iran continued to adhere to the agreement until this strike.

Before becoming President, Trump said multiple times that Obama would provoke Iran into conflict to secure re-election.

Business Insider – Why Iran’s Qassem Soleimani was on a not-so-secret trip to Iraq when he was assassinated
Business Insider – Here’s what’s in the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran that the country withdrew from amid heightened tensions with the US
The Atlantic – Soleimani Was Failing
NBC News – Iran pulling out of nuclear deal commitment after U.S. strike that killed Soleimani
Los Angeles Times – Israel had advance notice of U.S. plan to kill Iranian general Suleimani, report says
Daily Beast – Trump Told Mar-a-Lago Pals to Expect ‘Big’ Iran Action ‘Soon’
NPR – Trump Says He’ll Target Iran’s Cultural Sites. That’s Illegal
The New York Times – Pentagon Rules Out Striking Iranian Cultural Sites, Contradicting Trump
The New York Times – A Narrative Collapses as Trump Tweets: ‘It Doesn’t Really Matter’

withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal?

The Iran Nuclear Deal was an agreement reached between the United States, Iran, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Russia, and China. It strictly limited the amount of enriched uranium and enrichment equipment Iran could have for a period of 15 years. In exchange, sanctions on Iran were to be lifted, and Iranian funds frozen after the 1979 revolution were to be returned.

Trump described the Obama administration’s “embarrassing” treaty with Iran to be “decaying and rotten.” He withdrew the United States from the deal unilaterally in 2018 and restored prior sanctions. The European Union sought to maintain the agreement, and passed a blocking statute to ban all EU citizens and business with complying with US sanctions on Iran. Iran continued to take part in the agreement until January of 2020, when a US drone strike killed a senior Iranian official.

Before becoming President, Trump said multiple times that Obama would provoke Iran into conflict to secure re-election.

BBC News – Iran nuclear deal: Trump pulls US out in break with Europe allies
The New York Times – Trump Abandons Iran Nuclear Deal He Long Scorned
Business Insider – Here’s what’s in the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran that the country withdrew from amid heightened tensions with the US
Reuters – EU aims to block U.S. sanctions on Iran
Wikipedia – Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action

insisted that he deserved the Nobel Peace Prize “for a lot of things?”

Trump was discussing the possibility of mediating a solution between India and Pakistan over a growing humanitarian crisis in the disputed Kashmir region when a reporter mentioned the Nobel Peace Prize. Trump replied, “I think I’m gonna get a Nobel Prize for a lot of things, if they gave it out fairly, which they don’t.” Trump had been previously nominated by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at the request of the US government.

Trump remarked on President Obama having been awarded the prize: “He had no idea why he got it and you know what, that was the only thing I agreed with him on.”

On the subject of negotiations between the geopolitical rivals, Trump said, “I’ve never failed as an arbitrator. I’ve been asked to arbitrate disputes, pretty big ones, from friends. And I’ve done it in a good successful fashion.”

Time – President Trump Insists He Would Get a Nobel Prize, If ‘They Gave It Out Fairly’
The Hill – Trump says he would be awarded Nobel Peace Prize ‘if they gave it out fairly’
The Hill – US asked Japanese leader to nominate Trump for Nobel Prize: report

abruptly ordered the withdrawal of US forces from a base in Syria, abandoning Kurdish allies to be attacked by Turkey?

The base had been so hastily abandoned that photographs show it was still powered and stocked with food. Russian journalists took footage of the abandoned base and claimed in media broadcasts, “Manbij is ours!” Turkey immediately began an offense against Kurdish militias in the region, who had lost over 10,000 soldiers fighting alongside the US against ISIS. Trump later tweeted about his own “great and unmatched wisdom” regarding the matter.

Though the Kurds had long been US allies in the region, Trump dismissed concerns about them by saying they are “no angels.” He also suggested that the Kurds were releasing ISIS prisoners, though other US officials have said that this was being done by Turkish-backed forces. Concerns about the released ISIS prisoners were dismissed as being a problem for Europe instead of the United States. Trump claimed that allies like the United Kingdom’s were “thrilled” with his decision, though the UK government has denied this, and opposed any Turkish incursion. Other reports with sources in Trump’s administration assert that he believed Turkey to be bluffing, and that it wouldn’t actually attack Syria.

Trump also claimed that the soldiers that had been stationed in Syria would be coming home, when in fact they were just to be redeployed to Iraq.

Newsweek – RUSSIANS SHARE VIDEOS FROM HASTILY ABANDONED U.S. BASE IN SYRIA: ‘MANBIJ IS OURS!’
Independent – Trump says Kurds are ‘no angels’, after US allies helped defeat Isis
Business Insider – Trump suggested the Kurds were releasing ISIS prisoners, but US officials say Turkish-backed forces are actually doing this
Independent – ‘No idea where that came from’: Government denies Trump’s claim UK was ‘thrilled’ with his Syria decision
Axios – Behind the scenes of the Trump bluff that kicked off Turkey’s invasion
The Washington Post – Trump isn’t ‘bringing our soldiers back home’ from Syria

referred to his own “great and unmatched wisdom”?

The Trump failed to elaborate on what “I’ve done before!” meant in reference to totally destroying and obliterating an economy.

The tweet came following Trump’s decision to withdraw US forces from a base in Syria, the occupation of the base by Russian forces, and Turkey’s subsequent operations against Kurdish militia groups that had long been US allies.

The New York Times – Trump Orders Withdrawal of U.S. Troops From Northern Syria

More assuredly to come soon

Error: Please refresh